Chorus:
“There are men who love women who love men
There are women who love women every now and then
There are men who love men because they can’t pretend
They are men who love women who love men”--Steve Goodman, from the “High and Outside” album
This entry is much delayed, what with GA and a family vacation happening back to back, I just haven’t had much time to blog. But I did tell a friend about working on this post.
June 18th marked the anniversary of the dh & I getting married. We’ve been married for a long time. Long enough, and then some, to see our three children grown. Long enough, and then some, to have weathered deaths, health problems, and career uncertainties, together. Long enough, and then some, to realize that we’re in it for the long haul with each other. We didn’t say “until death do we part,” but it looks like that’s what it will be. And I’m glad of that.
As I saw
video and photos of so many happy people – the men marrying men and women marrying women in California – I was happy for them, one and all. One of my friends was in San Francisco and posted photos of ecstatic brides and grooms at City Hall. Over at
Ogre's place you can read about his wonderful afternoon of celebrating with happy couples.
Many of the couples are longtime partners, like Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon. Hey, after 55 years together, I think it will last. Others are marrying partners they’ve had children with, and even grandchildren! Some are marrying right away – others like George Takei and Brad Altman are planning weddings for a few months from now. Love is in the air. And, yeah, some may be marrying each other on a whim, but: Whether you or I think it’s a good idea does NOT matter. There are plenty of straight couples who “marry in haste, repent in leisure” as the old saying goes. (Remember Britney’s first, disastrous union in Vegas?)
Here’s what matters: Love. As
Ms. Kitty pointed out at her place, love is not a sin. Love is what brings people together, love is what sanctifies these marriages, love is what can get couples through the rough patches. Many of those marrying already know about rough patches – and they’ve still managed to build lives and families together. Now they can have a little more security, a little more legal protection, and a little more pride.
I’m reminded, as are others, of the struggle of another couple: Mildred and Richard Loving. The Lovings married in Washington, DC in 1958, and returned to their home state of Virginia to live. I can’t imagine how humiliating it must have been for them to literally be dragged from their bed and arrested for violating the law.
They were convicted of violating state laws prohibiting the marriage of interracial couples in 1959. Their jail sentences were suspended on the condition that they leave the state, which they did. In 1963, the Lovings and the ACLU began the court battle which resulted in the US Supreme Court declaring Virginia’s (and all other states’) anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional in 1968. I can’t imagine the courage it took for them to fight the system. Richard Loving died in 1975, Mildred in 2008.
I don't have a problem with the courts deciding this. If the Lovings had been forced to wait for voters to approve their relationship, they may have never been able to live in Virginia as they wished. Before she died, Mildred Loving pointed out the similarity between their struggle and the struggles of gays and lesbians for the right to marry. This was echoed in a video I saw of a John Lewis & Stuart Gaffney, a gay couple who were plaintiffs in the California case, and who married on June 17. Lewis is biracial, and his parents were only able to marry after an earlier California court decision in 1948, so the connection is vivid and personal for him.
Okay – enough with the history lesson. My point is that for a previous generation the huge freakin’ deal was interracial marriage. For the generation before that the big deal was religiously "mixed" marriages (Christian/Jew or Catholic/Protestant). If “whites” and “people of color” were allowed to marry it would be the end of marriage as we know it! It would violate a sacred institution! If a Catholic married a Protestant, where would the children go to church? (The local Unitarian church, maybe?) What would be next? Dogs and cats living together??? (Okay – I’ve been the road too long, I’m starting to channel Bill Murray…)
Guess what.
John Lewis’ parents marrying didn’t cause California to fall into the ocean – or the end of marriage as an institution and desirable state.
Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin marrying has done NO harm to my marriage. George Takei and Brad Altman marrying each other - and all those other men marrying men and women marrying women - will have a similar non-effect.
Let’s get over ourselves. What is more sacred than witnessing the love and commitment of any two people, who promise to care for each other in sickness and in health – who may already have done so for decades? And just why do we think one pair’s commitment is more sacred than another?
Now, will someone please get the federal DOMA cancelled & cast a spell on the Supremes to declare all those "marriage = one man, one woman" amendments unconstitutional, so some of my dearest friends can get married, already???
/soapbox